CONTRACTS – variation – whether term of credit facility varied – whether variation supported by adequate consideration – where difference in obligations capable of benefiting either party – contract effectively varied – whether bank repudiated contract in maintaining that term varied.
BANKING AND FINANCE – Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), ss 12CB and 12DA – whether in varying term of credit facility bank engaged in misleading or deceptive or unconscionable conduct – whether in making loan bank engaged in unconscionable conduct – no question of principle.
BANKING AND FINANCE – Code of Banking Practice, cll 2.2, 25.1 and 25.2 – whether breach of obligation to exercise care and skill of a diligent and prudent banker – whether breach of obligation to try to help borrower to overcome financial difficulties with a credit facility – no question of principle.
BANKING AND FINANCE – National Credit Code – whether loan “unjust” credit contract within s 76(1) – whether bank failed to respond to hardship notices as required by s 72(4) – whether National Credit Code applied – where the predominant purpose for which credit was provided or was intended to be provided was not a Code purpose – no question of principle.
PRIMARY INDUSTRY – Farm Debt Mediation Act 1994 (NSW) – whether enforcement action taken in contravention of Act – no question of principle.
Tim Castle SC represented the Second and Third Respondents.
Reasons for the decision can be found here.